Filming isn't covered directly in most of the twelve books this guide draws from — phone cameras are a newer convenience most of them predate. But the underlying discipline they all teach, in different language, is the same one video makes possible: you cannot accurately remember your own set. You remember how it felt, which is a bad substitute for what actually happened. A recording is the only honest record.

The cheapest setup that works

Audio matters more than video. A room's laughter, and whether your words are landing clean or getting swallowed by your own mic technique, is audible on a phone propped on a table or a chair near the front, angled up at the stage. You do not need a tripod, a second camera, or good lighting to do the actual work this module is about — you need to be able to hear yourself and hear the room. If you're filming for a future submission tape (module 10), that's a separate, higher-bar exercise; for the self-review this module is about, a phone in your pocket, propped against a water glass, is enough.

Ask first

Some rooms restrict filming, because other comics on the same bill are testing untested material they don't want appearing online before they've decided it works. Ask the host before you set anything up — it takes one sentence, and running a camera without asking is one of the fastest ways to become the "run the light" of the etiquette rules in module 4: a small thing that a host remembers.

The review method

The American Comedy Institute, founded and run by Stephen Rosenfield — author of *Mastering Stand-Up* — builds student development around this exact practice: performances are videotaped and critiqued in class before a student's final set in front of a real audience. The specific value isn't watching yourself for how you look. It's watching for pacing: where you rushed a setup an audience needed a beat longer to absorb, where a laugh was still going when you talked over it and stepped on it, which filler words (a "so," an "um," a repeated "right?") you don't hear yourself saying live. None of that is audible to you in the moment on stage. It is unmissable on a recording.

What John Vorhaus's revision loop looks like applied to tape

*The Comic Toolbox* argues that a joke is a hypothesis you test, not a finished object — you write it, say it to a room, and revise based on what actually happened, not what you expected to happen. Video is what makes that revision accurate instead of guesswork. Without a recording, you're revising from memory of a moment that happened fast, in front of you, while you were also nervous. With one, you can go back and check: did that line get a laugh, or did you just feel good walking off? Those are not always the same thing, and new comics reliably misjudge which bits actually worked until they start reviewing tape.

What's worth keeping versus what's just for you

Most of what you film is for your own review only — a bad recording of a bit that needs three more rewrites has no future life. Save clips for a reel or a submission tape (module 10) only once a bit has survived several open-mic reps and reliably gets a laugh; a booker or a follower watching a clip has no context for the version that was still being worked out. And never post another comic's set from a shared bill without asking them directly — the same untested-material courtesy from module 4 applies double once a phone is recording.

Sources cited in this module

• Stephen Rosenfield, *Mastering Stand-Up* (Chicago Review Press, 2017) — and the videotape-and-critique method used in his American Comedy Institute classes, as documented in coverage of the school's teaching approach
• John Vorhaus, *The Comic Toolbox: How to Be Funny Even If You're Not* (Silman-James Press, 1994)

Your next step in your city